Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36

Thread: I have made my peace with Stanly Kubrick

  1. #11
    Inactive Member Generic Skinhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 12th, 2001
    Posts
    1,009
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, helvetica, sans serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by LAmind:
    For weeks I've been experimenting with looks and styles in my head, trying to analyze what my legacy will be.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    WOW...17 years old and your already pondering your legacy? What a prodigy you must be!



    ------------------
    I can't believe I sold my image rights for a pint of Guinness!

  2. #12
    Inactive Member shirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 7th, 2000
    Posts
    274
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Your exactly right about 'it's the time that matters.' When a studio or production company is paying 30 to 40 people to work on film shoot, many of them are doing nothing for half the day. Examples being boom operators, focus pullers, etc. A mass amount of a films budget is paying them. So the faster they shoot, the less the studio has to pay them.

    Now, I don't know if this is entirely true, but I've heard the Kubrick used so much film in a 'Clockwork' that the final print is only about 1% of the film he actually shot.

    ------------------

  3. #13
    Inactive Member chinnyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 21st, 2001
    Posts
    42
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Talking

    that must have been fun to edit...
    especially given as it was on film! and not digital smile


    ------------------

  4. #14
    Inactive Member SoulJacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 30th, 2001
    Posts
    612
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Wink

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, helvetica, sans serif">quote:</font><HR> I really don't give opinions, just facts.
    Anyways, I was wrong about Kubrick not deciding is visual style for his films...
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Is the fact here then your often wrong?


    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, helvetica, sans serif">quote:</font><HR> I'm just saying that I see a piece of my own mind in his movies.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    WTF?

    ------------------
    Jay & Silent Bob DO NOT LICK BALLS.

  5. #15
    Inactive Member shirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 7th, 2000
    Posts
    274
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Nah, I'm often right. I'm just willing to admit when I am wrong. And after looking into Kubrick I discovered that I have never heard of any of his cinematographers.

    ------------------

  6. #16
    Inactive Member Curtin-Parloe's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 6th, 2000
    Posts
    376
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I just remember reading about a famous(at the time - I don't know his name) DoP on The Killing (outrageously excluded from the Kubrick Collection, IMO). Kubrick set up a tracking shot with a wide lens and went for lunch, and when he got back the DoP had changed the lens and moved the track. Kubrick lost his rag and made the DoP change it all back. The DoP hadn't thought about Depth of Field, which made all the difference in the shot. Apparently.

    cheers

    Paul

    PS before you all get shirty, I don't have the actual account to hand so I can't remember exactly. It's just a good story!


    ------------------
    BAD EYE - It's finally here! www.curtin-parloe.co.uk/badeye Curtin Parloe 2001

  7. #17
    Inactive Member seekaee's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 27th, 2001
    Posts
    157
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, helvetica, sans serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by shirt:
    When a studio or production company is paying 30 to 40 people to work on film shoot, many of them are doing nothing for half the day. Examples being boom operators focus pullers, etc.
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Being a focus puller or a boom operator might look easy but it?s still a demanding job and if you screw up one to many times- or even worse-someone THINKS you screwed up.You might never work again, especialy if it's someone like Spielberg or Lucas. Honistly,of all the "crew members" the Cops have it the easiest most of the time,as they just sit in their cars all day "wating" for something to happen.

    As the why the Killing isn?t in the Kubrick collection is because the movie is owned by MGM,not Warners.




    [This message has been edited by seekaee (edited January 31, 2002).]

  8. #18
    Inactive Member shirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 7th, 2000
    Posts
    274
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I never once said it was easy to be a boom op or focus puller... it's just a lot of money that is wasted if movie is not being shot to schedule. That's why there are assistant director's, etc. to make sure everything goes to schedule and people are not sitting around. Filmmaking is just waiting.

    ------------------

  9. #19
    Inactive Member Curtin-Parloe's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 6th, 2000
    Posts
    376
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Dr Stranglelove is MGM i think, I'll look at the spines when I get home. Certainly, not ALL included are warner.


    I don't mind about Spartacus (my wife's favourite) because I have that already.

    Surely the whole point of a collection is to have all of the work, otherwise it's a selection wink

    cheers

    Paul

  10. #20
    Inactive Member SoulJacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 30th, 2001
    Posts
    612
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, helvetica, sans serif">quote:</font><HR>I FINALY know what was inside his mind when he made his films. I couldn't believe how similar his films were to the thoughts i had inside my head about my own future films. I could finally understand. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    LOL - When someone comes up with a barmy statement like this, what do you expect?

    ------------------
    Jay & Silent Bob DO NOT LICK BALLS.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •